Traditional Role In The District Surabaya


  • Siwidyah Desi Lastianti Universitas Merdeka Surabaya



government policy, PAD district


This study aims to determine: (1) the district government Surabaya in determining the block in Citra Niaga Market location Surabaya; (2) the implementation of the allotment of Block G-2; (3) increase in local revenues derived from market sectors. The data used is data 2003 to 2005 from the Office of Market and Regional Financial Management Agency Surabaya. Primary data has also used that data obtained from the heads of the market and traders in Citra Niaga Market Surabaya. The results of this research are: 1) the efforts made by the government in overcoming the problems Surabaya by: (a) re-creating the kiosks/stalls in block G-2 is optimal; (b) rearranging merchants to trade freely in the street Seroja to enter into site Citra Niaga Market Block G-2; (c) issuing policies related to the market environment is clean, beautiful and comfortable; (d) issue a policy concerning Retribution in block G-2, which is equal to the Retribution rates for merchants selling goods on the street Seroja (behind the market Citra Niaga), this will affect the selling price of goods sold by traders in the block G- 2 is equal to the selling price of the merchant on the street Seroja; (e) provides that a policy of cheap money installments for traders in block G-2 that will be able to attract other merchants to hire kiosk / Los block the G-2; (2) Contributions Retribution Citra Niaga to the PAD market is still small, need to be improved.


Download data is not yet available.


Ahmad Antono K, 2003., Complete Dictionary ofEconomics,Gitamedia Press, Jakarta.
Bappeda district Surabaya, 2006, the Drafting Team, Utilization Study Block G-2 Citra Niaga Market Surabaya,Surabaya District Development Planning Agency.
Bappeda district Surabaya, 2007, Tim Composer, Final Report: Community Economic Development Plan inSurabaya, Surabaya District Development Planning Agency.
Halim, Abdul., 2001, Anthology of Regional Financial Management.Jogjakarta: UPP AMP YKPN.
Halim, A. and Abdullah, S., 2004, Local Original Revenue (PAD) as a Source of DevelopmentFinancing, paper presented at the conference IRSA (Indonesian Regional Science Association) to 6 in Jogjakarta.
Haryotejo, B., 2014. DAMPAK EKSPANSI HYPERMARKET TERHADAP PASAR TRADISIONAL DI DAERAH. Jurnal Bina Praja, Volume 6(Nomor 3 Edisi September 2014), pp.241–248.
Liao, K.-H. & Huang, I.-S., 2016. Impact of Vision, Strategy, and Human Resource on Nonprofit Organization Service Performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224(August 2015), pp.20–27. Available at:
Koswara , E., 2000, Toward Regional Autonomy Implementation Based on Law No. 22 of 1999, Analysis,CSIS, Year XXIX / 2000 No.1.36-53.
Lincoln Soeratno and Arsyad, 2008, Research Methodology for Economics and Business, UPP AMP YKPN, Yogyakarta.
The Institute of Public Administration and BPKP, 1999, Socialization Module Accountability System for Government Agencies(AKIP), Jakarta.
Miller, Stephen M. and Frank S. Russek, Fiscal Structures and Economic Growth at The State and Local Level, Public Finance Review, Vol 25, No. 2.213 to 237, 1997.
Saad Ilyas., 2003, Implemantasi Autonomous Region has led to distortions and High Cost Economy,Smeru Working Paper.
Santoso, Nice, 1995, Retribution Market For Local Revenue, Market Case Study Sleman,Prisma Number 4, LP3ES 19-35.
Sarmanu, 2005, Research Methodology, LPPM, Airlangga University, Surabaya,
Suindyah, Sayekti, D, 2004, Ekonomi Mikro, Pascasarjana Undar Press, Surabaya.
The Institute of Public Administration and BPKP, 1999, Socialization Module Accountability System for Government Agencies(AKIP), Jakarta.
Wijaya Putra, University team, 2001, Planning Implementation and Evaluation Public discretion,Wijaya Putra University Press, Surabaya.
______________, 2004, Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 32 Year 2004 on Financial Balance between Central and Local Government, the Directorate General PUOD, Jakarta.
______________, 2004, Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 33 Year 2004 on Regional Government, Directorate General PUOD, Jakarta.
_______________, 2003, Surabaya District Regulation No. 10 Year 2003 regarding the Strategic Plan of Surabaya, Surabaya District Government.
_______________, 2004, Surabaya District Regulation No. 27 of 2004 on the Organizational Structure and Work Procedure Markets Department, Government of Surabaya.
________________, 2006, Surabaya District Regulation No. 12 Year 2006 on retributions Market, Surabaya District Government.
_______________, 2005, Surabaya Regent Decree No. 82 Year 2005 on the Establishment of the Organization and Work Procedure UPTD Citra Niaga Market Surabaya, Surabaya District Government.